-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Uniform main and backport code #127766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ldematte
merged 1 commit into
elastic:main
from
ldematte:entitlements/init-refactorings-4
May 7, 2025
Merged
Uniform main and backport code #127766
ldematte
merged 1 commit into
elastic:main
from
ldematte:entitlements/init-refactorings-4
May 7, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra (Team:Core/Infra) |
prdoyle
approved these changes
May 6, 2025
💚 Backport successful
|
ldematte
added a commit
to ldematte/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
While backporting entitlement initialization refactorings, I realized there is a mismatch in getVersionSpecificCheckerClass signature, and also that this function in the backports is used in more places (DynamicInstrumentation), making it "strange" to have this in EntitlementInitialization. This PR extracts the function to a separate static class (package-private) and makes the signature uniform with backports. This will need to be backported manually to the 8.x branches, and will make the backported version of DynamicInstrumentation cleaner.
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
While backporting entitlement initialization refactorings, I realized there is a mismatch in getVersionSpecificCheckerClass signature, and also that this function in the backports is used in more places (DynamicInstrumentation), making it "strange" to have this in EntitlementInitialization. This PR extracts the function to a separate static class (package-private) and makes the signature uniform with backports. This will need to be backported manually to the 8.x branches, and will make the backported version of DynamicInstrumentation cleaner.
ywangd
pushed a commit
to ywangd/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
While backporting entitlement initialization refactorings, I realized there is a mismatch in getVersionSpecificCheckerClass signature, and also that this function in the backports is used in more places (DynamicInstrumentation), making it "strange" to have this in EntitlementInitialization. This PR extracts the function to a separate static class (package-private) and makes the signature uniform with backports. This will need to be backported manually to the 8.x branches, and will make the backported version of DynamicInstrumentation cleaner.
afoucret
pushed a commit
to afoucret/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
While backporting entitlement initialization refactorings, I realized there is a mismatch in getVersionSpecificCheckerClass signature, and also that this function in the backports is used in more places (DynamicInstrumentation), making it "strange" to have this in EntitlementInitialization. This PR extracts the function to a separate static class (package-private) and makes the signature uniform with backports. This will need to be backported manually to the 8.x branches, and will make the backported version of DynamicInstrumentation cleaner.
jfreden
pushed a commit
to jfreden/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2025
While backporting entitlement initialization refactorings, I realized there is a mismatch in getVersionSpecificCheckerClass signature, and also that this function in the backports is used in more places (DynamicInstrumentation), making it "strange" to have this in EntitlementInitialization. This PR extracts the function to a separate static class (package-private) and makes the signature uniform with backports. This will need to be backported manually to the 8.x branches, and will make the backported version of DynamicInstrumentation cleaner.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-backport
Automatically create backport pull requests when merged
:Core/Infra/Entitlements
Entitlements infrastructure
>refactoring
Team:Core/Infra
Meta label for core/infra team
v9.0.2
v9.1.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While backporting entitlement initialization refactorings, I realized there is a mismatch in getVersionSpecificCheckerClass signature, and also that this function in the backports is used in more places (DynamicInstrumentation), making it "strange" to have this in EntitlementInitialization. This PR extracts the function to a separate static class (package-private) and makes the signature uniform with backports.
This will need to be backported manually to the 8.x branches, and will make the backported version of DynamicInstrumentation cleaner.